<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Survivor Quitters!!! &#8212; ARRGGHH!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:21:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/#comment-288397</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/2008/03/19/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/#comment-288397</guid>
		<description>this was the only episode i watched of this current season (and I&#039;ve watched nearly every episode since season 1 and this reminded me so much of one of my coworkers. I remember thinking, &quot;yes, quit&quot; because I often think this woman I work with should. 
 
Also, I personally decided not to watch Survivor anymore because I just think it&#039;s not glorifying God for me to watch female rear ends hanging out of their shorts and showering topless... that sort of thing. I&#039;m trying to keep my mind clear of that stuff and I have stuff I should be reading anyway, so I&#039;ll fill my time in other ways. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this was the only episode i watched of this current season (and I&#039;ve watched nearly every episode since season 1 and this reminded me so much of one of my coworkers. I remember thinking, &quot;yes, quit&quot; because I often think this woman I work with should.</p>
<p>Also, I personally decided not to watch Survivor anymore because I just think it&#039;s not glorifying God for me to watch female rear ends hanging out of their shorts and showering topless&#8230; that sort of thing. I&#039;m trying to keep my mind clear of that stuff and I have stuff I should be reading anyway, so I&#039;ll fill my time in other ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/#comment-403221</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/2008/03/19/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/#comment-403221</guid>
		<description>this was the only episode i watched of this current season (and I&#039;ve watched nearly every episode since season 1 and this reminded me so much of one of my coworkers. I remember thinking, &quot;yes, quit&quot; because I often think this woman I work with should.

Also, I personally decided not to watch Survivor anymore because I just think it&#039;s not glorifying God for me to watch female rear ends hanging out of their shorts and showering topless... that sort of thing. I&#039;m trying to keep my mind clear of that stuff and I have stuff I should be reading anyway, so I&#039;ll fill my time in other ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this was the only episode i watched of this current season (and I&#8217;ve watched nearly every episode since season 1 and this reminded me so much of one of my coworkers. I remember thinking, &#8220;yes, quit&#8221; because I often think this woman I work with should.</p>
<p>Also, I personally decided not to watch Survivor anymore because I just think it&#8217;s not glorifying God for me to watch female rear ends hanging out of their shorts and showering topless&#8230; that sort of thing. I&#8217;m trying to keep my mind clear of that stuff and I have stuff I should be reading anyway, so I&#8217;ll fill my time in other ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/#comment-286964</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/2008/03/19/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/#comment-286964</guid>
		<description>I am not a regular Survivor watcher (I have watched one (1) episode of Survivor - not by choice. . .I was travelling for work and my coworker *needed* to see the final of the first year while we ate at a bar.)  But, I do think the idea of quitters is a severe detraction from the concept and entertainment value of the show.  Since it may be impossible to prevent it, I think they should do something to factor it into the show (similar to bringing back a previously eliminiated contestant).  My proposal (based on old shipping tales) is that the &quot;posessions of the deceased sailor&quot; are auctioned up among his peers.  Have the contestants accumulate points and when they go find a means to fight it out for them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a regular Survivor watcher (I have watched one (1) episode of Survivor &#8211; not by choice. . .I was travelling for work and my coworker *needed* to see the final of the first year while we ate at a bar.)  But, I do think the idea of quitters is a severe detraction from the concept and entertainment value of the show.  Since it may be impossible to prevent it, I think they should do something to factor it into the show (similar to bringing back a previously eliminiated contestant).  My proposal (based on old shipping tales) is that the &quot;posessions of the deceased sailor&quot; are auctioned up among his peers.  Have the contestants accumulate points and when they go find a means to fight it out for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/#comment-403220</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/2008/03/19/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/#comment-403220</guid>
		<description>I am not a regular Survivor watcher (I have watched one (1) episode of Survivor - not by choice. . .I was travelling for work and my coworker *needed* to see the final of the first year while we ate at a bar.)  But, I do think the idea of quitters is a severe detraction from the concept and entertainment value of the show.  Since it may be impossible to prevent it, I think they should do something to factor it into the show (similar to bringing back a previously eliminiated contestant).  My proposal (based on old shipping tales) is that the &quot;posessions of the deceased sailor&quot; are auctioned up among his peers.  Have the contestants accumulate points and when they go find a means to fight it out for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a regular Survivor watcher (I have watched one (1) episode of Survivor &#8211; not by choice. . .I was travelling for work and my coworker *needed* to see the final of the first year while we ate at a bar.)  But, I do think the idea of quitters is a severe detraction from the concept and entertainment value of the show.  Since it may be impossible to prevent it, I think they should do something to factor it into the show (similar to bringing back a previously eliminiated contestant).  My proposal (based on old shipping tales) is that the &#8220;posessions of the deceased sailor&#8221; are auctioned up among his peers.  Have the contestants accumulate points and when they go find a means to fight it out for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/#comment-286960</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/2008/03/19/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/#comment-286960</guid>
		<description>No...bring back the last voted off.  Gives the rest of the tribe more reason to talk them into staying.  Punishment to the tribe for not being able to keep the &quot;team&quot; together.  Not as big a deal when it goes to individual immunity.  People can quit all they want! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8230;bring back the last voted off.  Gives the rest of the tribe more reason to talk them into staying.  Punishment to the tribe for not being able to keep the &quot;team&quot; together.  Not as big a deal when it goes to individual immunity.  People can quit all they want!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/#comment-403219</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bnpositive.com/blog/2008/03/19/survivor-quitters-arrgghh/#comment-403219</guid>
		<description>No...bring back the last voted off.  Gives the rest of the tribe more reason to talk them into staying.  Punishment to the tribe for not being able to keep the &quot;team&quot; together.  Not as big a deal when it goes to individual immunity.  People can quit all they want!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8230;bring back the last voted off.  Gives the rest of the tribe more reason to talk them into staying.  Punishment to the tribe for not being able to keep the &#8220;team&#8221; together.  Not as big a deal when it goes to individual immunity.  People can quit all they want!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.bnpositive.com @ 2012-02-07 09:01:06 by W3 Total Cache -->
